Why identification of stroke syndromes is still important

Sandeep Kumar, Louis R. Caplan

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent trends in the practice of stroke neurology lay a strong and excessive reliance on data generated from large epidemiological and clinical trials to direct patient care. This article highlights some of the pitfalls of this approach. It discusses the continuing importance of identifying stroke syndromes in implementing individualized patient care. RECENT FINDINGS: Stroke is a heterogeneous disease and occurs through a variety of mechanisms. With the help of examples, the article illustrates some of the complexities of clinical decision making in an individual patient. Some important recent advances in the diagnostic and treatment armamentarium for stroke are also discussed. SUMMARY: Identification of stroke syndromes remains an important tool in the rational management of stroke patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)78-82
Number of pages5
JournalCurrent Opinion in Neurology
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Randomized trials
  • Stroke subtyping
  • Stroke syndromes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why identification of stroke syndromes is still important'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this