Why does Ni suppress superconductivity in La1.85Sr0.15Cu1-yNiyO4?

Daniel Haskel, Edward A. Stern, Victor Polinger, Fatih Dogan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The role played by Ni impurities in destroying the superconducting state of La2-xSrxCuO4 is still unclear. This is partly due to the lack of clear experimental evidence on the effect of Ni substitution upon the atomic and electronic structure of this cuprate. To provide this information, we performed Ni K-edge polarized XAFS measurements on oriented powder. A special magnetic alignment geometry allowed us to measure pure ĉ and âb-polarized XAFS in identical experimental conditions. We found that the NiO6 octahedra are contracted along the ĉ-axis by 0.16(Å) relative to the CuO6 octahedra in La1.85Sr0.15CuO4, dragging La atoms and causing the observed macroscopic ĉ-axis contraction. This contraction reflects the non-Jahn-Teller 3d8 state of Ni in this compound (similar to that in La2NiO4) and indicates that Ni does not "trap" hole carriers but rather, probably, "repels" them. We suggest that this repulsion is the mechanism behind Tc suppression.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)758-760
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Synchrotron Radiation
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 1999
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Jahn-Teller
  • Nickel doping
  • Superconductivity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why does Ni suppress superconductivity in La1.85Sr0.15Cu1-yNiyO4?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this