Which diagnostic approach is more valid? The DSM or the rational-choice theory of neurosis

Yacov Rofé

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This article challenges the validity of the DSM-III to exclude neurosis, a decision that has led the DSM to become “an expanding list of disease, from a few dozen disorders in the first edition to well over 200” (Grinker, 2010, p. 169; see also Warelow & Holmes, 2011). It points out the unanimous consensus that the best diagnostic approach would be a theory that can account for the development and treatment of certain diagnostic categories and, at the same time, provide measurable criteria that can distinguish them from other behaviors. Accordingly, it shows that a new theory, the Rational-Choice Theory of Neurosis (RCTN) (Rofé, 2000, 2010, 2016; Rofé & Rofé, 2013, 2015), which despite profound differences is similar to psychoanalysis in several fundamental respects, can offer practical diagnostic criteria that differentiate neurosis from other disorders. Three types of evidence, including a review of research literature, case studies and a new study that directly examined the validity of RCTN’s diagnostic criteria, support the validity of neurosis. The greatest advantage of RCTN’s diagnostic approach is not only is based on empirical evidence instead of the consensus of biased researchers. Rather, their main contribution is that it emerged out of a theory that succeeded to integrate research and clinical data pertaining to the development and treatment of neurosis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98-110
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Psychological Studies
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2016

Bibliographical note

Cited By (since 2016): 5

M1 - Query date: 2022-05-02 15:12:45

M1 - 5 cites: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=15769256009697029126&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=2007&hl=en


Dive into the research topics of 'Which diagnostic approach is more valid? The DSM or the rational-choice theory of neurosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this