When Two Groups Hurt Each Other: Understanding and Reducing the Negative Consequences of Collective Victimhood in Dual Conflicts

Nurit Shnabel, Rotem Kahalon, Johannes Ullrich, Anna Lisa Aydin

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

This chapter builds on the needs-based model of reconciliation, which posits victim groups’ primary need for agency and perpetrator groups’ primary need for morality, and examines dual conflicts in which groups are both victims and perpetrators. The authors posit that in such cases, the experience of victimization is more psychologically impactful than the experience of perpetration. They review empirical support for this “primacy of agency” effect, as well as evidence of the effects of interventions that affirm the group’s agency in such contexts. The findings show that agency affirmations increase conciliatory responses toward the other conflict party as well as the willingness to relinquish power and violence for the sake of morality. These effects were found across both higher and lower power groups in the conflicts that were examined.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Social Psychology of Collective Victimhood
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages399-418
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9780190875220
ISBN (Print)9780190875190
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Oxford University Press 2020. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Agency
  • Dual conflicts
  • Israeli–Palestinian conflict
  • Morality
  • Needs-based model of reconciliation
  • Primacy of agency
  • Reconciliation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When Two Groups Hurt Each Other: Understanding and Reducing the Negative Consequences of Collective Victimhood in Dual Conflicts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this