Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

When Choices Are Not Personal: The Effect of Statistical and Social Cues on Children's Inferences About the Scope of Preferences

  • Bar-Ilan University
  • Cornell University
  • University of California at Berkeley

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

Individual choices are commonly taken to manifest personal preferences. The present study investigated whether social and statistical cues influence young children's inferences about the generalizability of preferences. Preschoolers were exposed to either 1 or 2 demonstrators’ selections of objects. The selected objects constituted 18%, 50%, or 100% of all available objects. We found that children took a single demonstrator's choices as indicative only of his or her personal preference. However, when 2 demonstrators made the same selection, then children inferred that it generalized to other agents of the same kind as the original demonstrator's, but not to agents of a different kind. Lastly, only when both demonstrators blatantly violated random selection (i.e., in the 18% condition) did children generalize the preference even to an agent of a different kind. Thus, from a young age, social and statistical cues inform children's naïve sociology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)370-380
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Cognition and Development
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Mar 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Funding

This research was funded by Grant #672/09 awarded by the Israel Science Foundation to GD.

Funders
Israel Science Foundation

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'When Choices Are Not Personal: The Effect of Statistical and Social Cues on Children's Inferences About the Scope of Preferences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this