What is wrong with us? Improving robustness through social diagnosis

Gal A. Kaminka, Milind Tambe

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Robust behavior in complex, dynamic environments mandates that intelligent agents autonomously monitor their own run-time behavior, detect and diagnose failures, and attempt recovery. This challenge is intensified in multi-agent settings, where the coordinated and competitive behaviors of other agents affect an agent's own performance. Previous approaches to this problem have often focused on single agent domains and have failed to address or exploit key facets of multi-agent domains, such as handling team failures. We present SAM, a complementary approach to monitoring and diagnosis for multi-agent domains that is particularly well-suited for collaborative settings. SAM includes the following key novel concepts: First, SAM's failure detection technique, inspired by social psychology, utilizes other agents as information sources and detects failures both in an agent and in its teammates. Second, SAM performs social diagnosis, reasoning about the failures in its team using an explicit model of teamwork (previously, teamwork models have been employed only in prescribing agent behaviors in teamwork). Third, SAM employs model sharing to alleviate the inherent inefficiencies associated with representing multiple agent models. We have implemented SAM in a complex, realistic multi-agent domain, and provide detailed empirical results assessing its benefits.

Original languageEnglish
Pages97-104
Number of pages8
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes
EventProceedings of the 1998 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI - Madison, WI, USA
Duration: 26 Jul 199830 Jul 1998

Conference

ConferenceProceedings of the 1998 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI
CityMadison, WI, USA
Period26/07/9830/07/98

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What is wrong with us? Improving robustness through social diagnosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this