What are the type, direction, and strength of species, community, and ecosystem responses to warming in aquatic mesocosm studies and their dependency on experimental characteristics? A systematic review protocol

Tamar Guy-Haim, Harriet Alexander, Tom W. Bell, Raven L. Bier, Lauren E. Bortolotti, Christian Briseño-Avena, Xiaoli Dong, Alison M. Flanagan, Julia Grosse, Lars Grossmann, Sarah Hasnain, Rachel Hovel, Cora A. Johnston, Dan R. Miller, Mario Muscarella, Akana E. Noto, Alexander J. Reisinger, Heidi J. Smith, Karen Stamieszkin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Mesocosm experiments have become increasingly popular in climate change research as they bridge the gap between small-scale, less realistic, microcosm experiments, and large-scale, more complex, natural systems. Characteristics of aquatic mesocosm designs (e.g., mesocosm volume, study duration, and replication) vary widely, potentially affecting the magnitude and direction of effect sizes measured in experiments. In this global systematic review we aim to identify the type, direction and strength of climate warming effects on aquatic species, communities and ecosystems in mesocosm experiments. Furthermore, we will investigate the context-dependency of the observed effects on several a priori determined effect moderators (ecological and methodological). Our conclusions will provide recommendations for aquatic scientists designing mesocosm experiments, as well as guidelines for interpretation of experimental results by scientists, policy-makers and the general public. Methods: We will conduct a systematic search using multiple online databases to gather evidence from the scientific literature on the effects of warming experimentally tested in aquatic mesocosms. Data from relevant studies will be extracted and used in a random effects meta-analysis to estimate the overall effect sizes of warming experiments on species performance, biodiversity and ecosystem functions. Experimental characteristics (e.g., mesocosm size and shape, replication-level, experimental duration and design, biogeographic region, community type, crossed manipulation) will be further analysed using subgroup analyses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalEnvironmental Evidence
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 20 Mar 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Author(s).

Funding

This systematic review protocol originated from discussions that took place at the Ecological Dissertations in Aquatic Sciences (EcoDAS) XII Symposium in October 2016, which was hosted by the Center for Microbial Oceanography (C‑MORE) and the University of Hawaii. Funding for EcoDAS XII was provided by the NSF biological oceanography program (Award OCE‑1356192) and the Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography (ASLO).

FundersFunder number
Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography
National Science FoundationOCE‑1356192
Directorate for Geosciences1356192

    Keywords

    • Aquatic
    • Climate change
    • Estuarine
    • Experimental design
    • Freshwater
    • Global warming
    • Marine
    • Mesocosm
    • Methodology
    • Microcosm

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'What are the type, direction, and strength of species, community, and ecosystem responses to warming in aquatic mesocosm studies and their dependency on experimental characteristics? A systematic review protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this