Abstract
We determine the scoring rule that is most likely to select a high-ability candidate. A major result is that neither the widely used plurality rule nor the inverse-plurality rule are ever optimal, and that the Borda rule is hardly ever optimal. Furthermore, we show that only the almost-plurality, the almost-inverse-plurality, and the almost-Borda rule can be optimal. Which of the “almost” rules is optimal depends on the likelihood that a candidate has high ability and how likely committee members are to correctly identify the abilities of the different candidates.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 129-151 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Group Decision and Negotiation |
Volume | 27 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Feb 2018 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2018, Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature.
Keywords
- Committee decisions
- Scoring rules
- “Almost” voting rules