Vasectomy to prevent acute epididymo-orchitis after prostatic adenomectomy: Still a controversy

Santiago Richter, Oscar Embon, Nachman Saghi, Leon Bechar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

There has been a controversy for almost 80 years about the usefulness of vasectomy in the prevention of acute epididymo-orchitis (EO) after prostatic adenomectomy (PA). In the last few years, improved surgical equipment and new more effective antibiotics have drastically diminished the incidence of this complication. The purpose of this report is to show that because of the devastating effect of the disease, and in spite of its low incidence there is still a clear indication for vasectomy, and also that infected urine, a preoperative indwelling urethral catheter, duration of postoperative catheterization and postoperative complications do not affect the incidence of post-PA acute EO.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-285
Number of pages3
JournalUrologia Internationalis
Volume39
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Acute epididymitis
  • Suprapubic prostatic adenomectomy
  • Vascctomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Vasectomy to prevent acute epididymo-orchitis after prostatic adenomectomy: Still a controversy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this