TY - CHAP
T1 - VALIDATING FROGS AND PONDS IN MULTI-LEVEL CONTEXTS
T2 - SOME AFTERTHOUGHTS
AU - Chen, Gilad
AU - Mathieu, John E.
AU - Bliese, Paul D.
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - In this chapter we respond to Hofmann and Jones and Kim, who provided insightful comments on our framework for conducting multi-level construct validation. We specifically address issues surrounding the meaning, structure, and function of multi-level constructs, extending our framework for validation of within-person constructs, and frog-pond effects. In so doing, we hope to clarify further the process of validating constructs across multiple levels of analysis.
AB - In this chapter we respond to Hofmann and Jones and Kim, who provided insightful comments on our framework for conducting multi-level construct validation. We specifically address issues surrounding the meaning, structure, and function of multi-level constructs, extending our framework for validation of within-person constructs, and frog-pond effects. In so doing, we hope to clarify further the process of validating constructs across multiple levels of analysis.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/36148957505
U2 - 10.1016/s1475-9144(04)03016-4
DO - 10.1016/s1475-9144(04)03016-4
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.chapter???
AN - SCOPUS:36148957505
SN - 0762311061
SN - 9780762311064
T3 - Research in Multi-Level Issues
SP - 335
EP - 343
BT - Multi-level Issues in Organizational Behavior and Processes
PB - JAI Press
ER -