Two dimensional Standard Deontic Logic [including a detailed analysis of the 1985 Jones-Pörn deontic logic system]

Mathijs de Boer, Dov M. Gabbay, Xavier Parent, Marija Slavkovic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper offers a two dimensional variation of Standard Deontic Logic SDL, which we call 2SDL. Using 2SDL we can show that we can overcome many of the difficulties that SDL has in representing linguistic sets of Contrary-to-Duties (known as paradoxes) including the Chisholm, Ross, Good Samaritan and Forrester paradoxes. We note that many dimensional logics have been around since 1947, and so 2SDL could have been presented already in the 1970s. Better late than never! As a detailed case study illustrating the power of 2SDL, we examine the system DL of Deontic Logic of Andrew Jones and Ingmar Pörn offered in 1985 to solve the Chisholm paradox of Contrary to Duties. The critical examination is done using logics and methods available in 1985 and solutions are proposed using what was available in 1985.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)623-660
Number of pages38
JournalSynthese
Volume187
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgments We would like to express our gratitude to G. Aucher, G. Governatori, and L. van der Torre, for useful comments and discussions. Xavier Parent is currently supported by a grant from the National Research Fund (FNR) of Luxembourg (grant PDR-08-013).

Funding

Acknowledgments We would like to express our gratitude to G. Aucher, G. Governatori, and L. van der Torre, for useful comments and discussions. Xavier Parent is currently supported by a grant from the National Research Fund (FNR) of Luxembourg (grant PDR-08-013).

FundersFunder number
Fonds National de la Recherche LuxembourgPDR-08-013

    Keywords

    • Chisholm paradox
    • Contrary to Duties
    • Deontic Logic
    • Two dimensional temporal logic

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Two dimensional Standard Deontic Logic [including a detailed analysis of the 1985 Jones-Pörn deontic logic system]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this