Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Trial protocol to compare the efficacy of a smartphone-based blood glucose management system with standard clinic care in the gestational diabetic population

  • Lucy H. Mackillop
  • , Katy Bartlett
  • , Jacqueline Birks
  • , Andrew J. Farmer
  • , Oliver J. Gibson
  • , Dev A. Kevat
  • , Yvonne Kenworthy
  • , Jonathan C. Levy
  • , Lise Loerup
  • , Lionel Tarassenko
  • , Carmelo Velardo
  • , Jane E. Hirst
  • John Radcliffe Hospital
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Oxford
  • Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
  • Monash University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is rising in the UK. Good glycaemic control improves maternal and neonatal outcomes. Frequent clinical review of patients with GDM by healthcare professionals is required owing to the rapidly changing physiology of pregnancy and its unpredictable course. Novel technologies that allow home blood glucose (BG) monitoring with results transmitted in real time to a healthcare professional have the potential to deliver good-quality healthcare to women more conveniently and at a lower cost to the patient and the healthcare provider compared to the conventional faceto- face or telephone-based consultation. We have developed an integrated GDm-health management system and aim to test the impact of using this system on maternal glycaemic control, costs, patient satisfaction and maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to standard clinic care in a single large publicly funded (National Health Service (NHS)) maternity unit. Methods and analysis: Women with confirmed gestational diabetes in a current pregnancy are individually randomised to either the GDm-health system and half the normal clinic visits or normal clinic care. Primary outcome is mean BG in each group from recruitment to delivery calculated, with adjustments made for number of BG measurements, proportion of preprandial and postprandial readings and length of time in study, and compared between the groups. The secondary objective will be to compare the two groups for compliance to the allocated BG monitoring regime, maternal and neonatal outcomes, glycaemic control using glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and other BG metrics, and patient attitudes to care assessed using a questionnaire and resource use. Ethics and dissemination: Thresholds for treatment, dietary advice and clinical management are the same in both groups. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated electronically and in print.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere009702
JournalBMJ Open
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 17 Mar 2016
Externally publishedYes

Funding

FundersFunder number
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilEP/G036861/1

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Trial protocol to compare the efficacy of a smartphone-based blood glucose management system with standard clinic care in the gestational diabetic population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this