Towards a new theory of confirmation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Any sequence of events can be "explained" by any of an infinite number of hypotheses. Popper describes the "logic of discovery" as a process of choosing from a hierarchy of hypotheses the first hypothesis which is not at variance with the observed facts. Blum and Blum formalized these hierarchies of hypotheses as hierarchies of infinite binary sequences and imposed on them certain decidability conditions. In this paper we also consider hierarchies of infinite binary sequences but we impose only the most elementary Bayesian considerations. We use the structure of such hierarchies to define "confirmation". We then suggest a definition of probability based on the amount of confirmation a particular hypothesis (i.e. pattern) has received. We show that hypothesis confirmation alone is a sound basis for determining probabilities and in particular that Carnap's logical and empirical criteria for determining probabilities are consequences of the confirmation criterion in appropriate limiting cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-218
Number of pages12
JournalIsrael Journal of Mathematics
Volume50
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1985

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards a new theory of confirmation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this