Toward a Typology of Normative Drug Users Based on Levels of Functioning, Justifications and Types of Use

Moran Chassid-Segin, Keren Gueta, Natti Ronel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The study explores 29 individuals who described themselves as functioning normatively while using drugs on a regular basis. They defined their use as intensive, constant, and playing a significant part in their normative lives. The content analysis revealed a typology consisting of four different types of normative users: the socially connected users, the better coping users, the ambivalent users, and the recovering users. This typology was created on the basis of three axes: level of functioning, justification of use, style of use. Our typology highlights the differences between normative users with varying patterns of drug usage and levels of functioning, ranging from users who claim that drug use causes them no harm to those who acknowledge that drug use has significantly damaged their functioning. This typology places particular emphasis on normative users who are experiencing a range of difficulties and need specific forms of therapy to preserve their normative lives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)242-258
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Drug Issues
Volume50
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research is partially supported by a grant from the Bar-Ilan University.

FundersFunder number
Bar-Ilan University

    Keywords

    • drug discourse
    • drug normalization
    • drug typology
    • justification of use
    • normative functioning users

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Toward a Typology of Normative Drug Users Based on Levels of Functioning, Justifications and Types of Use'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this