TY - JOUR
T1 - To be or not to be planktonic? Self-inhibition of biofilm development
AU - Nagar, Elad
AU - Schwarz, Rakefet
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2015/5/1
Y1 - 2015/5/1
N2 - The transition between planktonic growth and biofilm formation represents a tightly regulated developmental shift that has substantial impact on cell fate. Here, we highlight different mechanisms through which bacteria limit their own biofilm development. The mechanisms involved in these self-inhibition processes include: (i) regulation by secreted small molecules, which govern intricate signalling cascades that eventually decrease biofilm development, (ii) extracellular polysaccharides capable of modifying the physicochemical properties of the substratum and (iii) extracellular DNA that masks an adhesive structure. These mechanisms, which rely on substances produced by the bacterium and released into the extracellular milieu, suggest regulation at the communal level. In addition, we provide specific examples of environmental cues (e.g. blue light or glucose level) that trigger a cellular response reducing biofilm development. All together, we describe a diverse array of mechanisms underlying self-inhibition of biofilm development in different bacteria and discuss possible advantages of these processes.
AB - The transition between planktonic growth and biofilm formation represents a tightly regulated developmental shift that has substantial impact on cell fate. Here, we highlight different mechanisms through which bacteria limit their own biofilm development. The mechanisms involved in these self-inhibition processes include: (i) regulation by secreted small molecules, which govern intricate signalling cascades that eventually decrease biofilm development, (ii) extracellular polysaccharides capable of modifying the physicochemical properties of the substratum and (iii) extracellular DNA that masks an adhesive structure. These mechanisms, which rely on substances produced by the bacterium and released into the extracellular milieu, suggest regulation at the communal level. In addition, we provide specific examples of environmental cues (e.g. blue light or glucose level) that trigger a cellular response reducing biofilm development. All together, we describe a diverse array of mechanisms underlying self-inhibition of biofilm development in different bacteria and discuss possible advantages of these processes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928253055&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1462-2920.12583
DO - 10.1111/1462-2920.12583
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.shortsurvey???
C2 - 25088599
SN - 1462-2912
VL - 17
SP - 1477
EP - 1486
JO - Environmental Microbiology
JF - Environmental Microbiology
IS - 5
ER -