The View of the Three Monotheistic Religions Toward Cadaveric Organ Donation

Ya'arit Bokek-Cohen, Riad Abu-Rakia, Pazit Azuri, Mahdi Tarabeih

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Religious concerns regarding the legitimacy of cadaveric organ donation have been found to be major inhibiting factors for people to consent to donate organs post-mortem for transplantation; this constitutes a major cause for the grave shortfall of available organs for transplantation. The purpose of this review is to explore the view of the three monotheistic religions, namely Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, toward cadaveric organ donation. The literature review reveals that all three monotheistic religions support cadaveric organ donation but within certain restrictions. We provide a detailed description of the approach of each religion and the inhibiting considerations as interpreted by religious authorities. Health professionals need to collaborate with faith leaders in order to optimize the education of the public of believers with regard to the benefits stemming from organ donation. Developing transplantation medicine does not depend solely on technical capabilities and expertise; rather, this development should go hand in hand with religious, traditional and cultural beliefs and rituals. Providing a believer with a religious authority about cadaveric organ donation is very effective in helping families and individuals cope with difficult and critical decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)429-444
Number of pages16
JournalOmega: Journal of Death and Dying
Volume85
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.

Keywords

  • Christianity
  • Islam
  • Judaism
  • organ donation
  • organ procurement
  • religion
  • transplantation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The View of the Three Monotheistic Religions Toward Cadaveric Organ Donation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this