Abstract
There has always been a common perception that religion and politics are particularly and
uniquely intertwined in Middle Eastern culture. While the anecdotal evidence for this perception
is overwhelming, there have been few cross-sectional, large-n studies which have attempted to
confirm this perception and explain why this close connection between religion and politics in
the Middle East exists. Accordingly, this study uses the Minorities at Risk dataset to test this
perception with regard to ethnic conflicts by comparing ethnic conflicts in the Middle East to
those occurring in the rest of the world. The results show that on all measures used here,
religion is at least twice as powerful an influence on Middle Eastern ethnic conflicts as it is on
such conflicts in the rest of the world. However, other than this, Middle Eastern ethnic conflicts
are not distinguishable from ethnic conflicts occurring elsewhere. These results hold up even
when controlling for the region's Islamic and autocratic nature.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 113-131 |
| Journal | Turkish Policy Quarterly |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| State | Published - 2004 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The unique role of religion in Middle Eastern ethnic conflict: A large-n study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver