Abstract
Humans refer to their mood state regularly in day-to-day as well as clinical interactions. Theoretical accounts suggest that when reporting on our mood we integrate over the history of our experiences; yet, the temporal structure of this integration remains unexamined. Here, we use a computational approach to quantitatively answer this question and show that early events exert a stronger influence on reported mood (a primacy weighting) compared to recent events. We show that a Primacy model accounts better for mood reports compared to a range of alternative temporal representations across random, consistent, or dynamic reward environments, different age groups, and in both healthy and depressed participants. Moreover, we find evidence for neural encoding of the Primacy, but not the Recency, model in frontal brain regions related to mood regulation. These findings hold implications for the timing of events in experimental or clinical settings and suggest new directions for individualized mood interventions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e62051 |
Journal | eLife |
Volume | 10 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 15 Jun 2021 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021, eLife Sciences Publications Ltd. All rights reserved.
Funding
We thank Elisabeth A Murray and Nathaniel D Daw for helpful comments and questions. This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Mental Health National Institutes of Health (NIH) (Grant No. ZIA-MH002957-01 to AS). RBR is supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (1R01MH124110), a Medical Research Council Career Development Award (MR/N02401X/1), and a NARSAD Young Investigator Award from the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation, P&S Fund. This work used the computational resources of the NIH HPC (high-performance computing) Biowulf cluster (http://hpc.nih.gov). The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Health and Human Services, or the United States Government.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
National Institute of Mental Health National Institutes of Health | |
National Institutes of Health | ZIA-MH002957-01 |
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services | |
National Institute of Mental Health | R01MH124110 |
Brain and Behavior Research Foundation | |
National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression | |
Medical Research Council | MR/N02401X/1 |