The technical landscape for patient-centered CDS: Progress, gaps, and challenges

  • Prashila Dullabh
  • , Krysta Heaney-Huls
  • , David F. Lobach
  • , Lauren S. Hovey
  • , Shana F. Sandberg
  • , Priyanka J. Desai
  • , Edwin Lomotan
  • , James Swiger
  • , Michael I. Harrison
  • , Chris Dymek
  • , Dean F. Sittig
  • , Aziz Boxwala

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Supporting healthcare decision-making that is patient-centered and evidence-based requires investments in the development of tools and techniques for dissemination of patient-centered outcomes research findings via methods such as clinical decision support (CDS). This article explores the technical landscape for patient-centered CDS (PC CDS) and the gaps in making PC CDS more shareable, standards-based, and publicly available, with the goal of improving patient care and clinical outcomes. This landscape assessment used: (1) a technical expert panel; (2) a literature review; and (3) interviews with 18 CDS stakeholders. We identified 7 salient technical considerations that span 5 phases of PC CDS development. While progress has been made in the technical landscape, the field must advance standards for translating clinical guidelines into PC CDS, the standardization of CDS insertion points into the clinical workflow, and processes to capture, standardize, and integrate patient-generated health data.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1101-1105
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 May 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association.

Keywords

  • clinical decision support
  • patient-centered care, patient-generated health data

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The technical landscape for patient-centered CDS: Progress, gaps, and challenges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this