TY - JOUR
T1 - The structural diversity of AB S3 compounds with d 0 electronic configuration for the B -cation
AU - Brehm, John A.
AU - Bennett, Joseph W.
AU - Schoenberg, Michael Rutenberg
AU - Grinberg, Ilya
AU - Rappe, Andrew M.
PY - 2014/6/14
Y1 - 2014/6/14
N2 - We use first-principles density functional theory within the local density approximation to ascertain the ground state structure of real and theoretical compounds with the formula ABS3 (A = K, Rb, Cs, Ca, Sr, Ba, Tl, Sn, Pb, and Bi; and B = Sc, Y, Ti, Zr, V, and Nb) under the constraint that B must have a d0 electronic configuration. Our findings indicate that none of these AB combinations prefer a perovskite ground state with corner-sharing BS6 octahedra, but that they prefer phases with either edge- or face-sharing motifs. Further, a simple two-dimensional structure field map created from A and B ionic radii provides a neat demarcation between combinations preferring face-sharing versus edge-sharing phases for most of these combinations. We then show that by modifying the common Goldschmidt tolerance factor with a multiplicative term based on the electronegativity difference between A and S, the demarcation between predicted edge-sharing and face-sharing ground state phases is enhanced. We also demonstrate that, by calculating the free energy contribution of phonons, some of these compounds may assume multiple phases as synthesis temperatures are altered, or as ambient temperatures rise or fall.
AB - We use first-principles density functional theory within the local density approximation to ascertain the ground state structure of real and theoretical compounds with the formula ABS3 (A = K, Rb, Cs, Ca, Sr, Ba, Tl, Sn, Pb, and Bi; and B = Sc, Y, Ti, Zr, V, and Nb) under the constraint that B must have a d0 electronic configuration. Our findings indicate that none of these AB combinations prefer a perovskite ground state with corner-sharing BS6 octahedra, but that they prefer phases with either edge- or face-sharing motifs. Further, a simple two-dimensional structure field map created from A and B ionic radii provides a neat demarcation between combinations preferring face-sharing versus edge-sharing phases for most of these combinations. We then show that by modifying the common Goldschmidt tolerance factor with a multiplicative term based on the electronegativity difference between A and S, the demarcation between predicted edge-sharing and face-sharing ground state phases is enhanced. We also demonstrate that, by calculating the free energy contribution of phonons, some of these compounds may assume multiple phases as synthesis temperatures are altered, or as ambient temperatures rise or fall.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902455624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1063/1.4879659
DO - 10.1063/1.4879659
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84902455624
SN - 0021-9606
VL - 140
JO - Journal of Chemical Physics
JF - Journal of Chemical Physics
IS - 22
M1 - 224703
ER -