The robustness of the optimal weighted majority rule to probability distortion

Eyal Baharad; Ruth Ben-Yashar

doi:10.1007/s11127-008-9378-7

The robustness of the optimal weighted majority rule to probability distortion

Eyal Baharad, Ruth Ben-Yashar

Department of Economics

University of Haifa

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study identifies the optimal collective decision rule in a dichotomous symmetric setting, allowing for probabilities distortion as originally assumed by Tversky and Kahneman (Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5(4):297-323, 1992). We show that previous results that identified the weighted majority rule as the optimal one, and did not consider subjective probabilities, are robust to such distortion in the sense that neither the rule nor the weights are changed.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	53-59
Number of pages	7
Journal	Public Choice
Volume	139
Issue number	1-2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9378-7
State	Published - Apr 2009

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank Doron Kliger, Shmuel Nitzan, Jacob Paroush, the editor, and two anonymous referees for their useful comments and discussions. The second author acknowledges the support of the Schnitzer Foundation for Research on the Israeli Economy and Society.

Funding

We thank Doron Kliger, Shmuel Nitzan, Jacob Paroush, the editor, and two anonymous referees for their useful comments and discussions. The second author acknowledges the support of the Schnitzer Foundation for Research on the Israeli Economy and Society.

Funders	Funder number
Schnitzer Foundation for Research on the Israeli Economy and Society

Keywords

Condorcet jury theorem
Optimal rule
Subjective probabilities

Access to Document

10.1007/s11127-008-9378-7

Cite this

@article{2d554958a88d4b0a8aa6b7c43ba6837b,

title = "The robustness of the optimal weighted majority rule to probability distortion",

abstract = "This study identifies the optimal collective decision rule in a dichotomous symmetric setting, allowing for probabilities distortion as originally assumed by Tversky and Kahneman (Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5(4):297-323, 1992). We show that previous results that identified the weighted majority rule as the optimal one, and did not consider subjective probabilities, are robust to such distortion in the sense that neither the rule nor the weights are changed.",

keywords = "Condorcet jury theorem, Optimal rule, Subjective probabilities",

author = "Eyal Baharad and Ruth Ben-Yashar",

note = "Funding Information: We thank Doron Kliger, Shmuel Nitzan, Jacob Paroush, the editor, and two anonymous referees for their useful comments and discussions. The second author acknowledges the support of the Schnitzer Foundation for Research on the Israeli Economy and Society.",

year = "2009",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1007/s11127-008-9378-7",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "139",

pages = "53--59",

journal = "Public Choice",

issn = "0048-5829",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The robustness of the optimal weighted majority rule to probability distortion

AU - Baharad, Eyal

AU - Ben-Yashar, Ruth

N1 - Funding Information: We thank Doron Kliger, Shmuel Nitzan, Jacob Paroush, the editor, and two anonymous referees for their useful comments and discussions. The second author acknowledges the support of the Schnitzer Foundation for Research on the Israeli Economy and Society.

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - This study identifies the optimal collective decision rule in a dichotomous symmetric setting, allowing for probabilities distortion as originally assumed by Tversky and Kahneman (Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5(4):297-323, 1992). We show that previous results that identified the weighted majority rule as the optimal one, and did not consider subjective probabilities, are robust to such distortion in the sense that neither the rule nor the weights are changed.

AB - This study identifies the optimal collective decision rule in a dichotomous symmetric setting, allowing for probabilities distortion as originally assumed by Tversky and Kahneman (Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5(4):297-323, 1992). We show that previous results that identified the weighted majority rule as the optimal one, and did not consider subjective probabilities, are robust to such distortion in the sense that neither the rule nor the weights are changed.

KW - Condorcet jury theorem

KW - Optimal rule

KW - Subjective probabilities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62949224808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11127-008-9378-7

DO - 10.1007/s11127-008-9378-7

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???

AN - SCOPUS:62949224808

SN - 0048-5829

VL - 139

SP - 53

EP - 59

JO - Public Choice

JF - Public Choice

IS - 1-2

ER -

The robustness of the optimal weighted majority rule to probability distortion

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Funding

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this