Abstract
To break COVID-19 infection chains, the Israeli government authorized the Israeli Security Agency (ISA) to assist the Ministry of Health in tracing individuals who were in the vicinity of confirmed COVID-19 cases. Israel was the only democracy that used its security services to reduce morbidity via a nonvoluntary digital tracing tool, which was challenged with respect to both its epidemiological added value and its compliance with human rights. The Israeli High Court of Justice confirmed the ISA’s authorization based on a majority opinion, holding that the concomitant restriction of individual rights, especially the right to privacy, was proportionate. Surveillance and epidemiological investigations are common practices aimed at controlling infectious disease transmission. However, in an effort to adhere to public health values, alternatives to a nonvoluntary tool should be sought to ensure both the protection of individual privacy and the promotion of public trust and well-being.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proportionality |
| Subtitle of host publication | A Guiding Principle in Public Health Law, Ethics, and Policy |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Pages | 255-266 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780197759370 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780197759370 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2026 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Oxford University Press 2026.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- COVID-19
- Israel
- constitutional law
- contact tracing
- privacy
- proportionality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Right to Privacy, Contact Tracing, and Public Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Israeli Case'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver