TY - JOUR
T1 - The reproductive performance of women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program
AU - Ulug, Ulun
AU - Ben-Shlomo, Izhar
AU - Tosun, Süleyman
AU - Erden, Halit Firat
AU - Akman, Mehmet Ali
AU - Bahceci, Mustafa
PY - 2005/4
Y1 - 2005/4
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the outcome of women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Methods: We retrospectively assessed outcomes in 58 women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) and, as matched controls, in 116 women with tubal factor (TF) infertility who underwent assisted reproduction treatment (ART). For ovulation induction, human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) was used in HH patients and a combination of hMG and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist was used in TF patients. Conception and implantation rates, as well as duration of stimulation and number of oocytes retrieved, were the main outcome measures. Results: Of the 58 HH patients, 53 (91.3%) responded adequately to ovulation induction and underwent ET. A larger amount of gonadotropins and a longer duration of ovarian stimulation were needed in HH patients than in TF patients. The mean number of retrieved oocytes and implantation rates did not differ between the groups. In addition, there were no differences between the HH and TF groups in pregnancy (53.8 vs. 48.6%) and multiple pregnancy (63.4 vs. 48.4%) rates. In the HH group, the miscarriage rate was 3.4%, and none of these patients developed severe OHSS. Conclusion: IVF in HH patients, in which there was a background of previous failed ovulation induction, was as successful as in women with TF infertility.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the outcome of women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Methods: We retrospectively assessed outcomes in 58 women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) and, as matched controls, in 116 women with tubal factor (TF) infertility who underwent assisted reproduction treatment (ART). For ovulation induction, human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) was used in HH patients and a combination of hMG and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist was used in TF patients. Conception and implantation rates, as well as duration of stimulation and number of oocytes retrieved, were the main outcome measures. Results: Of the 58 HH patients, 53 (91.3%) responded adequately to ovulation induction and underwent ET. A larger amount of gonadotropins and a longer duration of ovarian stimulation were needed in HH patients than in TF patients. The mean number of retrieved oocytes and implantation rates did not differ between the groups. In addition, there were no differences between the HH and TF groups in pregnancy (53.8 vs. 48.6%) and multiple pregnancy (63.4 vs. 48.4%) rates. In the HH group, the miscarriage rate was 3.4%, and none of these patients developed severe OHSS. Conclusion: IVF in HH patients, in which there was a background of previous failed ovulation induction, was as successful as in women with TF infertility.
KW - Hypogonadism
KW - Hypogonadotropism
KW - IVF
KW - Induction
KW - Ovulation
KW - Pregnancy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20844438207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10815-005-4914-6
DO - 10.1007/s10815-005-4914-6
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 16021861
AN - SCOPUS:20844438207
SN - 1058-0468
VL - 22
SP - 167
EP - 171
JO - Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
JF - Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
IS - 4
ER -