The Relevance of the Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint Discourse

Original language	American English
Pages (from-to)	331-338
Journal	Tulsa Law Review
Volume	47
State	Published - 2011

Access to Document

• https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?lname=&public=false&collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/tlj47&men_hide=false&men_tab=toc&kind=&page=331

Cite this

• APA
• Author
• BIBTEX
• Harvard
• Standard
• RIS
• Vancouver

Bendor, A. (2011). The Relevance of the Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint Discourse. Tulsa Law Review, 47, 331-338. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?lname=&public=false&collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/tlj47&men_hide=false&men_tab=toc&kind=&page=331

Bendor, A. / The Relevance of the Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint Discourse. In: Tulsa Law Review. 2011 ; Vol. 47. pp. 331-338.

@article{f7f194ac9dde43199a042f113dea5f84,

title = "The Relevance of the Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint Discourse",

author = "A. Bendor",

year = "2011",

language = "American English",

volume = "47",

pages = "331--338",

journal = "Tulsa Law Review",

issn = "1538-9979",

}

Bendor, A 2011, 'The Relevance of the Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint Discourse', Tulsa Law Review, vol. 47, pp. 331-338. <https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?lname=&public=false&collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/tlj47&men_hide=false&men_tab=toc&kind=&page=331>

The Relevance of the Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint Discourse. / Bendor, A.
In: Tulsa Law Review, Vol. 47, 2011, p. 331-338.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Relevance of the Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint Discourse

AU - Bendor, A.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

M3 - Article

SN - 1538-9979

VL - 47

SP - 331

EP - 338

JO - Tulsa Law Review

JF - Tulsa Law Review

ER -

Bendor A. The Relevance of the Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint Discourse. Tulsa Law Review. 2011;47:331-338.