The Rationale of the Rule That Forbids a Lawyer To Be Advocate and Witness in the Same Case

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Access to Document

@article{dc36ea9756cc4ac9898c002a5bebb75a,

title = "The Rationale of the Rule That Forbids a Lawyer To Be Advocate and Witness in the Same Case",

author = "Enker, \{Arnold N.\}",

year = "1977",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1111/j.1747-4469.1977.tb00729.x",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "2",

pages = "455--465",

journal = "Law and Social Inquiry",

issn = "0897-6546",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Rationale of the Rule That Forbids a Lawyer To Be Advocate and Witness in the Same Case

AU - Enker, Arnold N.

PY - 1977/4

Y1 - 1977/4

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84985315991

U2 - 10.1111/j.1747-4469.1977.tb00729.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1747-4469.1977.tb00729.x

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???

AN - SCOPUS:84985315991

SN - 0897-6546

VL - 2

SP - 455

EP - 465

JO - Law and Social Inquiry

JF - Law and Social Inquiry

IS - 2

ER -