The Proportional Internalization Principle in Private Law

Omer Y. Pelled

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

According to common conception, laws should make actors internalize all the costs and benefits of their actions to make them behave efficiently. This article shows that even when only partial internalization is possible, private law can create efficient incentives by ensuring that each actor internalizes an identical proportion of the costs and benefits. This proportional internalization principle has profound implications. In tort law, it offers a new mechanism for dividing liability between multiple parties. In contract law, it suggests a new default rule for joint ventures. And, in restitution law, it presents an alternative doctrinal formulation for restitution for unrequested benefit.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)160-204
Number of pages45
JournalJournal of Legal Analysis
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Business at Harvard Law School.

Keywords

  • K11
  • K12
  • K13

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Proportional Internalization Principle in Private Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this