The Present and Future of Verbal Lie Detection

Aldert Vrij; Pär Anders Granhag; Sharon Leal; Ronald P. Fisher; Steven M. Kleinman; Tzachi Ashkenazi

doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197649138.013.33

The Present and Future of Verbal Lie Detection

Aldert Vrij, Pär Anders Granhag, Sharon Leal, Ronald P. Fisher, Steven M. Kleinman, Tzachi Ashkenazi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The last thirty years has seen a transformation in deception research from passively observing subjects’ nonverbal behavior to actively interviewing subjects to elicit verbal cues to deceit. Although significant progress has been made, there is still much work to do in the rapidly developing field of verbal lie detection. In this contribution, we briefly discuss the current status of the field. We outline the four interview protocols most frequently discussed in the scientific literature to date-Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID), Cognitive Credibility Assessment (CCA), Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE), and Verifiability Approach (VA)-followed by the empirical support for these protocols. We then present ideas on how to move the field of verbal lie detection forward.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	The Oxford Handbook of Psychology and Law
Publisher	Oxford University Press
Pages	565-581
Number of pages	17
ISBN (Electronic)	9780197649169
ISBN (Print)	9780197649138
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197649138.013.33
State	Published - 1 Jan 2023
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Oxford University Press 2023.

Keywords

assessment criteria indicative of deception
cognitive credibility assessment
deception detection
forensic interviewing
strategic use of evidence
verbal lie detection
verifiability approach

Access to Document

10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197649138.013.33

Cite this

@inbook{a298e648d71d40229bd7ff358be75a6d,

title = "The Present and Future of Verbal Lie Detection",

abstract = "The last thirty years has seen a transformation in deception research from passively observing subjects{\textquoteright} nonverbal behavior to actively interviewing subjects to elicit verbal cues to deceit. Although significant progress has been made, there is still much work to do in the rapidly developing field of verbal lie detection. In this contribution, we briefly discuss the current status of the field. We outline the four interview protocols most frequently discussed in the scientific literature to date-Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID), Cognitive Credibility Assessment (CCA), Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE), and Verifiability Approach (VA)-followed by the empirical support for these protocols. We then present ideas on how to move the field of verbal lie detection forward.",

keywords = "assessment criteria indicative of deception, cognitive credibility assessment, deception detection, forensic interviewing, strategic use of evidence, verbal lie detection, verifiability approach",

author = "Aldert Vrij and Granhag, {P{\"a}r Anders} and Sharon Leal and Fisher, {Ronald P.} and Kleinman, {Steven M.} and Tzachi Ashkenazi",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Oxford University Press 2023.",

year = "2023",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197649138.013.33",

language = "אנגלית",

isbn = "9780197649138",

pages = "565--581",

booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Psychology and Law",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

address = "בריטניה",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Present and Future of Verbal Lie Detection

AU - Vrij, Aldert

AU - Granhag, Pär Anders

AU - Leal, Sharon

AU - Fisher, Ronald P.

AU - Kleinman, Steven M.

AU - Ashkenazi, Tzachi

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Oxford University Press 2023.

PY - 2023/1/1

Y1 - 2023/1/1

N2 - The last thirty years has seen a transformation in deception research from passively observing subjects’ nonverbal behavior to actively interviewing subjects to elicit verbal cues to deceit. Although significant progress has been made, there is still much work to do in the rapidly developing field of verbal lie detection. In this contribution, we briefly discuss the current status of the field. We outline the four interview protocols most frequently discussed in the scientific literature to date-Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID), Cognitive Credibility Assessment (CCA), Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE), and Verifiability Approach (VA)-followed by the empirical support for these protocols. We then present ideas on how to move the field of verbal lie detection forward.

AB - The last thirty years has seen a transformation in deception research from passively observing subjects’ nonverbal behavior to actively interviewing subjects to elicit verbal cues to deceit. Although significant progress has been made, there is still much work to do in the rapidly developing field of verbal lie detection. In this contribution, we briefly discuss the current status of the field. We outline the four interview protocols most frequently discussed in the scientific literature to date-Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception (ACID), Cognitive Credibility Assessment (CCA), Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE), and Verifiability Approach (VA)-followed by the empirical support for these protocols. We then present ideas on how to move the field of verbal lie detection forward.

KW - assessment criteria indicative of deception

KW - cognitive credibility assessment

KW - deception detection

KW - forensic interviewing

KW - strategic use of evidence

KW - verbal lie detection

KW - verifiability approach

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186007162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197649138.013.33

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197649138.013.33

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.chapter???

AN - SCOPUS:85186007162

SN - 9780197649138

SP - 565

EP - 581

BT - The Oxford Handbook of Psychology and Law

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -

The Present and Future of Verbal Lie Detection

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this