The Power of Why: Engaging the Goal Paradox in Program Evaluation

Victor J. Friedman, Jay Rothman, Bill Withers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Clearly defined and measurable goals are commonly considered prerequisites for effective evaluation. Goal setting, however, presents a paradox to evaluators because it takes place at the interface of rationality and values. The objective of this article is to demonstrate a method for unlocking this paradox by making goal setting a process of evaluating goals, not simply defining them. Goals can be evaluated by asking program stakeholders why their goals are important to them. Systematic inquiry into goals also prepares the ground for setting consensual goals that express what stakeholders really care about. This article describes the method, provides a case illustration, offers guidelines for practice, and discusses the method in the context of the evaluation literature on goals and goal setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)201-218
Number of pages18
JournalAmerican Journal of Evaluation
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • evaluating goals
  • goal setting
  • values inquiry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Power of Why: Engaging the Goal Paradox in Program Evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this