Abstract
We develop computational models to analyze court statements in order to assess judicial attitudes toward victims of sexual violence in the Israeli court system. The study examines the resonance of “rape myths” in the criminal justice system’s response to sex crimes, in particular in judicial assessment of victim’s credibility. We begin by formulating an ontology for evaluating judicial attitudes toward victim’s credibility, with eight ordinal labels and binary categorizations. Second, we curate a manually annotated dataset for judicial assessments of victim’s credibility in the Hebrew language, as well as a model that can extract credibility labels from court cases. The dataset consists of 855 verdict decision documents in sexual assault cases from 1990-2021, annotated with the help of legal experts and trained law students. The model uses a combined approach of syntactic and latent structures to find sentences that convey the judge’s attitude towards the victim and classify them according to the credibility label set. Our ontology, data, and models will be made available upon request, in the hope they spur future progress in this judicial important task.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2023 - Proceedings of the Conference |
Publisher | Association for Computing Machinery, Inc |
Pages | 111-120 |
Number of pages | 10 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9798400701979 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 19 Jun 2023 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2023 - Braga, Portugal Duration: 19 Jun 2023 → 23 Jun 2023 |
Publication series
Name | 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2023 - Proceedings of the Conference |
---|
Conference
Conference | 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2023 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Portugal |
City | Braga |
Period | 19/06/23 → 23/06/23 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© ICAIL 2023. All rights reserved.
Funding
This research was done in collaboration with Dr. Carmit Klar Cha-lamish, ARCCI and the Department of Criminology, Conflict Resolution, Management & Negotiation Graduate Program, Bar-Ilan University, Israel. The research was supported by a grant from the Center for Interdisciplinary Data Science Research at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (CIDR). We would like to thank Dana Epshtein, Itai Benshalom and Daniel Shwartstein for their valuable research assistance. This research was done in collaboration with Dr. Carmit Klar Chalamish, ARCCI and the Department of Criminology, Conflict Resolution, Management & Negotiation Graduate Program, Bar-Ilan University, Israel. The research was supported by a grant from the Center for Interdisciplinary Data Science Research at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (CIDR). We would like to thank Dana Epshtein, Itai Benshalom and Daniel Shwartstein for their valuable research assistance.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
CIDR | |
Department of Criminology | |
Bar-Ilan University | |
Hebrew University of Jerusalem |
Keywords
- Judicial decision making
- Rape myths
- Sexual violence
- Witness credibility