The paradox of bone mineral density and fracture risk in type 2 diabetes

Guang Fei Li, Pian Pian Zhao, Wen Jin Xiao, David Karasik, You Jia Xu, Hou Feng Zheng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Fracture risk in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients is paradoxically increased despite no decrease in areal bone mineral density (BMD). This phenomenon, known as the “diabetic bone paradox”, has been attributed to various factors including alterations in bone microarchitecture and composition, hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia, advanced glycation end products (AGEs), and comorbidities associated with T2D. Zhao et al. recently investigated the relationship between T2D and fracture risk using both genetic and phenotypic datasets. Their findings suggest that genetically predicted T2D is associated with higher BMD and lower fracture risk, indicating that the bone paradox is not observed when confounding factors are controlled using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. However, in prospective phenotypic analysis, T2D remained associated with higher BMD and higher fracture risk, even after adjusting for confounding factors. Stratified analysis revealed that the bone paradox may disappear when T2D-related risk factors are eliminated. The study also highlighted the role of obesity in the relationship between T2D and fracture risk, with BMI mediating a significant portion of the protective effect. Overall, managing T2D-related risk factors may be crucial in preventing fracture risk in T2D patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1100-1103
Number of pages4
JournalEndocrine
Volume85
Issue number3
Early online date26 Jun 2024
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024.

Keywords

  • Bone mineral density
  • Fracture risk
  • Paradox
  • Type 2 diabetes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The paradox of bone mineral density and fracture risk in type 2 diabetes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this