פירוש 'לקח טוב' על שיר השירים: מקומו בתולדות פרשנות שיר השירים ויחסו לפירוש רש"י למגילה

Translated title of the contribution: The Leqah Tov Commentary on "Song of Songs": Its Place in the History of Biblical Exegesis and its Relationship with the Commentary of Rashi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

For centuries, no systematic literal commentary was written on the Song of Songs. The emphasis in Jewish exegesis was always on allegorical interpretations. This article addresses the commentaries of the first two pioneers who departed from the allegorical approach: Rabbi Tubia ben Eliezer, compiler of the Midrash Leqah Tov, and Rashi (Rabbi Shelomo Yitzhaki), comparing their exegetical approaches and pointing out their respective uniqueness, with emphasis on the approach of R. Tubia, which has been neglected in scholarship. Contrary to common opinion, credit for the groundbreaking first literal commentary on Song of Songs belongs not to Rashi, but rather to R. Tubia, and to his father, R. Eliezer. We posit that these authors were influenced by the Byzantine school of literal exegesis, and might well have belonged to it. They were the first to propose both a literal commentary on Song of Songs and also to attempt a systematic allegorical interpretation of the text.
Translated title of the contributionThe Leqah Tov Commentary on "Song of Songs": Its Place in the History of Biblical Exegesis and its Relationship with the Commentary of Rashi
Original languageHebrew
Pages (from-to)225-241
Number of pages17
Journalשנתון לחקר המקרא והמזרח הקדום
Volume23
StatePublished - 2014

IHP Publications

  • ihp
  • Bible -- Criticism, interpretation, etc
  • Bible -- Song of Songs
  • טוביה בן אליעזר -- לקח טוב
  • פרשנות המקרא
  • שלמה בן יצחק (רש"י) -- פרוש לשיר השירים
  • תנ"ך. שיר השירים
  • Ṭoviyahu ben Eliʻezer -- active 11th century -- Leḳaḥ ṭov

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Leqah Tov Commentary on "Song of Songs": Its Place in the History of Biblical Exegesis and its Relationship with the Commentary of Rashi'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this