Abstract
Whereas in the past, Israeli successes on the battlefield compensated for deterrence and/or early warning failures, in the Second Lebanon War serious problems in Israeli military capabilities and conduct of war were exposed. The article offers explanations for the poor performance of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF): A late perception that it was war; adherence to post-heroic warfare under circumstances that rather required a different approach; the erosion of the IDF's fighting standards due to policing missions which had become its main task since the outbreak of the first Intifada in 1987; false Revolution in Military Affairs-inspired concepts; the adoption of the notion of controlling instead of capturing territory; a centralized logistic system; poor generalship; a hesitant and inexperienced political leadership, and IDF dominance in decisions on military matters.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3-40 |
| Number of pages | 38 |
| Journal | Journal of Strategic Studies |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Israeli military doctrine
- Revolution in military affairs
- Second lebanon war
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Israel defense forces in the second Lebanon war: Why the poor performance?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver