THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND DATING OF AMOS VI 2: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE FROM TELL ES-SÂFĪ/GATH

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

70 Scopus citations

Abstract

The historical context and interpretation of the mention of the cities of Calneh, Hamath and Gath in Amos vi 2, has been the subject of much discussion. Recent finds from the excavations at Tell es-Sâfī, Israel (identified as biblical Gath of the Philistines), uncovered a destruction level and a siege system dated to the late 9th cent. BCE, apparent evidence of the conquest of Gath by Hazael of Aram (2 Kings xii 18). Subsequently, the site is of little significance until the end of the Iron Age. Based on this it is suggested, the three cities mentioned in Amos refer to cities captured and destroyed by Hazael, and that this oracle written not long after the destruction of Gath, whilst the memory of these events (and particularly the destruction of Gath) was fresh.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319-334
Number of pages16
JournalVetus Testamentum
Volume54
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2004 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

11 For preliminary surveys of the results of the excavations, see, e.g., Boas and Maeir, 1998; idem, forthcoming; Boas, Maeir and Schneider; Maeir, 2000; idem, 2001; idem, forthcoming (A); idem, forthcoming (B); idem, forthcoming (C); Maeir and Ehrlich, 2000; idem, 2001; Ehrlich; Uziel; Ackermann et al.; Shai and Maeir. The excavations have been supported, by funding from, among others: the Kushitzky Foundation, the Ihel Foundation, and the Krautheimer Chair in Archaeology, all of Bar-Ilan University; the Institute for Aegean Prehistory; the Cotsen Foundation; and the Jewish Memorial Foundation. 12 See, e.g., Dothan; Stone.

FundersFunder number
Cotsen Foundation
Ihel Foundation
Kushitzky Foundation
Institute for Aegean Prehistory
Memorial Foundation for Jewish Culture

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND DATING OF AMOS VI 2: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE FROM TELL ES-SÂFĪ/GATH'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this