The ethics of gatekeeping tests: What have we learned in a hundred years?

Bernard Spolsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

56 Scopus citations

Abstract

Tests have always been used as a means of political and social control. Critics have emphasized their unfairness and what Edgeworth called their 'unavoidable uncertainty'. Test results are unreliable, especially at the extremes, and their pre dictive power is weak. Language testers above all need to be sceptical; they should insist that the most complete information about candidates be made available for selection decision-making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)242-247
Number of pages6
JournalLanguage Testing
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The ethics of gatekeeping tests: What have we learned in a hundred years?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this