The end–means nexus and policy conversion: evidence from two cases in Israeli immigrant integration policy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Conversion—redirection of existing tools to new goals—is one strategy of gradual transformative change. This strategy is appealing because it does not require actors to introduce new programs or tools. Despite this appeal, it is not as broadly used as other gradual change strategies. This paper argues that this is because there is an additional condition for conversion. To convert an instrument, agents of change should see the connection between the tool and its original goal as loose. That takes place when actors perceive the tool as generic or when they are part of instrument constituencies and not advocacy coalition. The paper demonstrates this argument using an analysis of a positive and a negative case of conversion from immigrant integration policy in Israel. As such, the paper expands our understanding of conversion, going beyond institutional and political factors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)713-733
Number of pages21
JournalPolicy Sciences
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Keywords

  • Advocacy coalition
  • Conversion
  • Integration policy
  • Policy tools

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The end–means nexus and policy conversion: evidence from two cases in Israeli immigrant integration policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this