The effect of risk sensitivity on a supply chain of mobile applications under a consignment contract with revenue sharing and quality investment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

56 Scopus citations

Abstract

The paper provides a thorough investigation of the revenue sharing contract format typically used in the mobile applications (Apps) industry. The platform provider sets the level of revenue sharing, and the App developer determines the investment in quality and the selling price of the App. The demand for an App, which depends on both price and quality investment, is assumed to be uncertain, so the risk attitude of the supply chain members has to be considered. Specifically, we focus on how risk-sensitive behavior of supply chain members affects chain performance. The members' equilibrium strategies are analyzed under different attitudes toward risk: averse, neutral and seeking. We show that the retailer's utility function has no effect on the equilibrium strategies, and suggest schemes to identify these strategies for any utility function of the developer. We find that (i) the revenue sharing contract circumvents the double marginalization effect associated with vertical competition and therefore yields the best selling price for the customer; (ii) a decentralized supply chain sometimes performs better than a centralized one; and (iii) a risk-seeking developer may obtain a higher expected profit than does a risk-neutral developer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-40
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Production Economics
Volume168
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Consignment contract
  • Game theory
  • Revenue sharing
  • Risk attitude
  • Stochastic dominance
  • Supply chain

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of risk sensitivity on a supply chain of mobile applications under a consignment contract with revenue sharing and quality investment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this