TY - JOUR
T1 - THE EFFECT OF LIPOSOMES' MEMBRANE COMPOSITION ON THE BINDING OF THE PHOTOSENSITIZERS HPD AND PHOTOFRIN II
AU - Ehrenberg, Benjamin
AU - Gross, Eitan
PY - 1988/10
Y1 - 1988/10
N2 - Abstract— Photofrin II (PF‐II) is the commercial name of the active photosensitizer which is used in photodynamic therapy of cancer. The effect of the composition of lipid membranes on the binding of PF‐II was studied and compared to hematoporphyrin derivative (Hpd), which is a complex mixture of porphyrins and from which PF‐II is separated. We find that increasing the content of cholesterol in the bilayer decreases the partitioning of PF‐II into the bilayer, similar to what we have found earlier with Hpd. However, inserting DMPC or DPPC into the membrane, which was shown to decrease the binding of Hpd, causes the opposite trend with PF‐H. A membrane fluidizer such as benzyl alcohol also has different effects on the membrane binding of Hpd and PF‐II. The rate of binding of PF‐II to a lipid membrane is about 10 times lower than that of Hpd. These results as well as I‐ quenching of the fluorescence of the two porphyrins indicate that PF‐II is immersed less homogeneously and deeper in the bilayer than Hpd. The unique additive‐dependent binding of PF‐II to lipid membranes calls for care in using Hpd as a model photosensitizer.
AB - Abstract— Photofrin II (PF‐II) is the commercial name of the active photosensitizer which is used in photodynamic therapy of cancer. The effect of the composition of lipid membranes on the binding of PF‐II was studied and compared to hematoporphyrin derivative (Hpd), which is a complex mixture of porphyrins and from which PF‐II is separated. We find that increasing the content of cholesterol in the bilayer decreases the partitioning of PF‐II into the bilayer, similar to what we have found earlier with Hpd. However, inserting DMPC or DPPC into the membrane, which was shown to decrease the binding of Hpd, causes the opposite trend with PF‐H. A membrane fluidizer such as benzyl alcohol also has different effects on the membrane binding of Hpd and PF‐II. The rate of binding of PF‐II to a lipid membrane is about 10 times lower than that of Hpd. These results as well as I‐ quenching of the fluorescence of the two porphyrins indicate that PF‐II is immersed less homogeneously and deeper in the bilayer than Hpd. The unique additive‐dependent binding of PF‐II to lipid membranes calls for care in using Hpd as a model photosensitizer.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024098344&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1988.tb02846.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1988.tb02846.x
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 2976507
AN - SCOPUS:0024098344
SN - 0031-8655
VL - 48
SP - 461
EP - 466
JO - Photochemistry and Photobiology
JF - Photochemistry and Photobiology
IS - 4
ER -