TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of cooking recipe storage on their retrieval
AU - Bergman, Ofer
AU - Shnaper-Reinberg, Ella
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Purpose: This study aimed to test the effect of the storage of home cooking recipes on their retrieval efficiency (i.e. percentage of mistaken and failed retrievals and retrieval times). Design/methodology/approach: We recruited 35 participants and asked each to retrieve five recipes they occasionally use for cooking. Findings: We found a positive correlation between the number of locations that participants used to store their recipes and the percentage of mistaken and failed retrievals, r(35) = 0.34, p = 0.04. The effort put into actively storing recipes (e.g. using handwritten notes, mobile notes and web bookmarks) paid off in their retrieval efficiency: Only 3% of the retrievals of actively stored recipes were mistaken or failed compared to 15% for the inactively stored recipes, and retrievals of actively stored recipes were 36% faster. Interestingly, our participants intuitively sensed this and actively stored 52% of their target recipes. Research limitations/implications: Our results may have implications for systems designed to automatically arrange personal information. These systems free the users from organizing information, but our results indicate that the very activity of organizing the information improves retrieval. Practical implications: Our results suggest that people should actively store their home cooking recipes and limit the number of their storage locations to improve their retrieval. Originality/value: This is the first paper on home-cooking recipe storage and retrieval.
AB - Purpose: This study aimed to test the effect of the storage of home cooking recipes on their retrieval efficiency (i.e. percentage of mistaken and failed retrievals and retrieval times). Design/methodology/approach: We recruited 35 participants and asked each to retrieve five recipes they occasionally use for cooking. Findings: We found a positive correlation between the number of locations that participants used to store their recipes and the percentage of mistaken and failed retrievals, r(35) = 0.34, p = 0.04. The effort put into actively storing recipes (e.g. using handwritten notes, mobile notes and web bookmarks) paid off in their retrieval efficiency: Only 3% of the retrievals of actively stored recipes were mistaken or failed compared to 15% for the inactively stored recipes, and retrievals of actively stored recipes were 36% faster. Interestingly, our participants intuitively sensed this and actively stored 52% of their target recipes. Research limitations/implications: Our results may have implications for systems designed to automatically arrange personal information. These systems free the users from organizing information, but our results indicate that the very activity of organizing the information improves retrieval. Practical implications: Our results suggest that people should actively store their home cooking recipes and limit the number of their storage locations to improve their retrieval. Originality/value: This is the first paper on home-cooking recipe storage and retrieval.
KW - Handwritten notes
KW - Human–computer interaction
KW - Personal information management (PIM)
KW - Recipes
KW - Retrieval
KW - Storage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105003765697&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/jd-01-2025-0031
DO - 10.1108/jd-01-2025-0031
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:105003765697
SN - 0022-0418
JO - Journal of Documentation
JF - Journal of Documentation
ER -