The early reactions to Value and capital: Critics, critiques and correspondence in comparative perspective

Warren Young

doi:10.1080/09538259100000013

The early reactions to Value and capital: Critics, critiques and correspondence in comparative perspective

Warren Young

Deakin University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

The reception of Hicks's Value and capital is not as well documented as other important economics books of that period. In this article I shall analyse the main reviews of Value and capital with special emphasis on the critical reviews. Reference will also be made to Hicks's unpublished correspondence with Hawtrey, Kaldor and Robertson. Finally a consideration of the important issues of communicability and relevance will be undertaken.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	289-308
Number of pages	20
Journal	Review of Political Economy
Volume	3
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259100000013
State	Published - 1 Jul 1991
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1080/09538259100000013

Cite this

@article{f1f8daeab53e4b7ea8a6c78e1612807f,

title = "The early reactions to Value and capital: Critics, critiques and correspondence in comparative perspective",

abstract = "The reception of Hicks's Value and capital is not as well documented as other important economics books of that period. In this article I shall analyse the main reviews of Value and capital with special emphasis on the critical reviews. Reference will also be made to Hicks's unpublished correspondence with Hawtrey, Kaldor and Robertson. Finally a consideration of the important issues of communicability and relevance will be undertaken.",

author = "Warren Young",

year = "1991",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1080/09538259100000013",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "3",

pages = "289--308",

journal = "Review of Political Economy",

issn = "0953-8259",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The early reactions to Value and capital

T2 - Critics, critiques and correspondence in comparative perspective

AU - Young, Warren

PY - 1991/7/1

Y1 - 1991/7/1

N2 - The reception of Hicks's Value and capital is not as well documented as other important economics books of that period. In this article I shall analyse the main reviews of Value and capital with special emphasis on the critical reviews. Reference will also be made to Hicks's unpublished correspondence with Hawtrey, Kaldor and Robertson. Finally a consideration of the important issues of communicability and relevance will be undertaken.

AB - The reception of Hicks's Value and capital is not as well documented as other important economics books of that period. In this article I shall analyse the main reviews of Value and capital with special emphasis on the critical reviews. Reference will also be made to Hicks's unpublished correspondence with Hawtrey, Kaldor and Robertson. Finally a consideration of the important issues of communicability and relevance will be undertaken.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/14844357276

U2 - 10.1080/09538259100000013

DO - 10.1080/09538259100000013

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???

SN - 0953-8259

VL - 3

SP - 289

EP - 308

JO - Review of Political Economy

JF - Review of Political Economy

IS - 3

ER -

The early reactions to Value and capital: Critics, critiques and correspondence in comparative perspective

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this