Abstract
Religious Zionists have been the driving force behind the settlement project in Israel for the past 40 years. They often see settling in the Greater Land of Israel as a messianic activity. It might be thought that when state policy clashes with radical messianic movements, the result would be violent, bloody confrontations. This study seeks to explain why this has not been the case in Israel despite the dismantling of settlements in the Sinai and Gaza and the controversial Oslo process. Although there has been turmoil and resistance, most religious Zionists have refrained from serious violence. We suggest that a "theological-normative balance" prevents all-out de-legitimation of the state and life-threatening violence against it.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 843-866 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Politics and Religion |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Dec 2016 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Dialectic between Confrontation and Commitment: Religious-Zionism and the Settlement Project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver