TY - JOUR
T1 - The development and evaluation of a hybrid decision support system for clinical decision making
T2 - The case of discharge from the military
AU - Benbenishty, Rami
AU - Treistman, Robin
PY - 1998/12
Y1 - 1998/12
N2 - This article reports on the development, implementation, and evaluation of a decision support system (DSS), a hybrid of a statistical model (regression equation) and expert rules, to support this decision. The study focused on the decisions made by social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists serving as military mental health officers to recommend discharge from compulsory duty in the Israeli army because of mental or emotional difficulties. The process involved three consecutive steps: modeling decisions by statistical analysis of past and current decisions and by eliciting expert rules, developing a hybrid decision support system, and evaluating the DSS through empirical validation and a user survey. The validity of this hybrid DSS was established. The DSS was able to predict 86.5 percent of new decisions made by mental health officers and 70 percent of past decisions. User acceptance, on the other hand, was low. This article discusses these findings and their implications for practice.
AB - This article reports on the development, implementation, and evaluation of a decision support system (DSS), a hybrid of a statistical model (regression equation) and expert rules, to support this decision. The study focused on the decisions made by social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists serving as military mental health officers to recommend discharge from compulsory duty in the Israeli army because of mental or emotional difficulties. The process involved three consecutive steps: modeling decisions by statistical analysis of past and current decisions and by eliciting expert rules, developing a hybrid decision support system, and evaluating the DSS through empirical validation and a user survey. The validity of this hybrid DSS was established. The DSS was able to predict 86.5 percent of new decisions made by mental health officers and 70 percent of past decisions. User acceptance, on the other hand, was low. This article discusses these findings and their implications for practice.
KW - Clinical judgment
KW - Decision support systems
KW - Expert rules
KW - Mental health officers
KW - Military
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0348194686&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/swr/22.4.195
DO - 10.1093/swr/22.4.195
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0348194686
SN - 1070-5309
VL - 22
SP - 195
EP - 204
JO - Social Work Research
JF - Social Work Research
IS - 4
ER -