The closer we get, the better we are?

Nathan Goldstein, Ben Zion Zilberfarb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Not always. A general requirement in models of expectations formation is that forecast accuracy should improve when getting closer to the target date. We apply a multi-horizon bootstrap test to a unique Israeli survey of firm-level inflation forecasts, which encompasses periods of three digits annual rates, and periods of moderate and low inflation. We find that improvements in forecast accuracy were significant during high and moderate inflation periods, but not in the low-inflation environment. The results are in line with rational inattention, induced by a decline in inflation predictability. Further support is provided by evidence from the US SPF survey.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)364-376
Number of pages13
JournalEconomic Inquiry
Volume61
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Economic Inquiry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Western Economic Association International.

Keywords

  • accuracy
  • bootstrap
  • expectations
  • inflation
  • rational inattention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The closer we get, the better we are?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this