Temporal Trends in the Prevalence, Treatment and Outcomes of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome at High Bleeding Risk

Ziad Arow, Tal Ovdat, Mustafa Gabarin, Alexander Omelchenko, Mony Shuvy, Tsafrir Or, Abid Assali, David Pereg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

(1) Background: High bleeding risk is associated with adverse outcomes in ACS patients. We aimed to evaluate temporal trends in treatment and outcomes of ACS patients according to bleeding risk. (2) Methods: Included were ACS patients enrolled in ACSIS surveys. Patients were divided into three groups according to enrolment period: early (2002–2004), mid (2006–2010) and recent (2012–2018). Each group was further stratified into three subgroups according to CRUSADE bleeding risk score. The primary endpoints were 30-day MACE and 1-year all-cause mortality. (3) Results: Included were 13,058 ACS patients. High bleeding risk patients were less frequently treated with guideline-based medications and coronary revascularization. They also had higher rates of 30-day MACE and 1-year all-cause mortality regardless of the enrollment period. Among patients enrolled in early period, 30-day MACE rates were 10.8%, 17.5% and 24.3% (p < 0.001) and 1-year all-cause mortality rates were 2%, 7.7% and 23.6% (p < 0.001) in the low, moderate and high bleeding risk groups, respectively. Among patients enrolled in mid period, 30-day MACE rates were 7.7%, 13.4% and 23.5% (p < 0.001) and 1-year all-cause mortality rates were 1.5%, 7.2% and 22.1% (p < 0.001) in low, moderate and high bleeding risk groups, respectively. For patients enrolled in recent period, 30-day MACE rates were 5.7%, 8.6% and 16.2%, (p < 0.001) and 1-year all-cause mortality rates were 2.1%, 6% and 22.4%, (p < 0.001) in low, moderate and high bleeding risk groups, respectively. These differences remained significant following a multivariate analysis. (4) Conclusions: The percentage of patients at high bleeding risk has decreased over the last years. Despite recent improvements in the treatment of ACS patients, high bleeding risk remains a strong predictor of adverse outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1784
JournalDiagnostics
Volume12
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 22 Jul 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors.

Keywords

  • CRUSADE Score
  • acute coronary syndrome
  • bleeding risk

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Temporal Trends in the Prevalence, Treatment and Outcomes of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome at High Bleeding Risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this