Abstract
Two information systems for Governmental policy making institutions, one in Egypt and the other in Israel, are compared and contrasted to understand and describe the unique character of the decision-making activities in such institutions. It is argued, that the underlying model of decision processes that is assumed in the design of conventional DSS is inadequate for very high level policy making environments. A broader view of the decision-making activities is presented and is shown to fit into a theoretical framework that combines the structured and anarchic perspectives of decision making. It is further argued, that support systems for high level policy making require an unconventional approach for their development.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 41-50 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Information and Management |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 1990 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
A case study of Israel and Egypt.Keywords
- DSS
- Decision making
- Development
- Government
- Policy making
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Support systems for high level policy making: What makes them special'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver