Successive Relative Transfer Function Identification Using Blind Oblique Projection

Dani Cherkassky, Sharon Gannot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Distortionless speech extraction in a reverberant environment can be achieved by applying a beamforming algorithm, provided that the relative transfer functions (RTFs) of the sources and the covariance matrix of the noise are known. In this paper, the challenge of RTF identification in a multi-speaker scenario is addressed. We propose a successive RTF identification (SRI) technique, based on the sole assumption that sources do not become simultaneously active. That is, we address the challenge of estimating the RTF of a specific speech source while assuming that the RTFs of all other active sources in the environment were previously estimated in an earlier stage. The RTF of interest is identified by applying the blind oblique projection (BOP)-SRI technique. When a new speech source is identified, the BOP algorithm is applied. BOP results in a null steering toward the RTF of interest, by means of applying an oblique projection to the microphone measurements. We prove that by artificially increasing the rank of the range of the projection matrix, the RTF of interest can be identified. An experimental study is carried out to evaluate the performance of the BOP-SRI algorithm in various signal to noise ratio (SNR) and signal to interference ratio (SIR) conditions and to demonstrate its effectiveness in speech extraction tasks.

Original languageEnglish
Article number8926399
Pages (from-to)474-486
Number of pages13
JournalIEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing
Volume28
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 IEEE.

Keywords

  • Oblique projection
  • Relative transfer function
  • System identification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Successive Relative Transfer Function Identification Using Blind Oblique Projection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this