Subtle is the lord: On the difference between Newtonian (Lyapunov) stability analysis and geometrical stability analysis of gravitational orbits

L. P. Horwitz, A. Yahalom, M. Lewkowicz, J. Levitan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this essay we discuss the geometrical embedding method (GEM) for the analysis of the stability of Hamiltonian systems using geometrical techniques familiar from general relativity. This method has proven to be very effective. In particular, we show that although the application of standard Lyapunov analysis predicts that completely integrable Kepler motion is unstable, this geometrical analysis predicts the observed stability. Moreover, we apply this approach to the three body problem in which the third body is restricted to move on a circle of large radius which induces an adiabatic time dependent potential on the second body. This causes the second body to move in a very intricate but periodic trajectory. The geometric approach predicts the correct stable motion in this case as well.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2787-2793
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Modern Physics D
Volume20
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - 31 Dec 2011

Keywords

  • Geometrical methods
  • Lyapunov exponents
  • linear analysis
  • stability of Keplerian orbits

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Subtle is the lord: On the difference between Newtonian (Lyapunov) stability analysis and geometrical stability analysis of gravitational orbits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this