TY - JOUR
T1 - Studying unconscious processing
T2 - Contention and consensus
AU - Stockart, François
AU - Schreiber, Maor
AU - Amerio, Pietro
AU - Carmel, David
AU - Cleeremans, Axel
AU - Deouell, Leon Y.
AU - Dienes, Zoltan
AU - Elosegi, Patxi
AU - Gayet, Surya
AU - Goldstein, Alon
AU - Halchin, Adelina Mihaela
AU - Hesselmann, Guido
AU - Kimchi, Ruth
AU - Lamy, Dominique
AU - Loued-Khenissi, Leyla
AU - Meyen, Sascha
AU - Micher, Nitzan
AU - Pitts, Michael
AU - Salomon, Roy
AU - Sandberg, Kristian
AU - Schnepf, Iris A.
AU - Schurger, Aaron
AU - Shanks, David R.
AU - Soto, David
AU - Tal, Amir
AU - Trübutschek, Darinka
AU - Vadillo, Miguel A.
AU - Van Gaal, Simon
AU - Yaron, Itay
AU - Zheng, Zefan
AU - Faivre, Nathan
AU - Mudrik, Liad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2025.
PY - 2025/7/22
Y1 - 2025/7/22
N2 - The scope of unconscious processing has long been, and still remains, a hotly debated issue. This is driven in part by the current diversity of methods to manipulate and measure perceptual consciousness. Here, we provide ten recommendations and nine outstanding issues about designing experimental paradigms, analyzing data, and reporting the results of studies on unconscious processing. These were formed through dialogue among a group of researchers representing a range of theoretical backgrounds. We acknowledge that some of these recommendations naturally do not align with some existing approaches and are likely to change following theoretical and methodological development. Nevertheless, we hold that at this stage of the field they are instrumental in evoking a much-needed discussion about the norms of studying unconscious processes and helping researchers make more informed decisions when designing experiments. In the long run, we aim for this paper and future discussions around the outstanding issues to lead to a more convergent corpus of knowledge about the extent-and limits-of unconscious processing.
AB - The scope of unconscious processing has long been, and still remains, a hotly debated issue. This is driven in part by the current diversity of methods to manipulate and measure perceptual consciousness. Here, we provide ten recommendations and nine outstanding issues about designing experimental paradigms, analyzing data, and reporting the results of studies on unconscious processing. These were formed through dialogue among a group of researchers representing a range of theoretical backgrounds. We acknowledge that some of these recommendations naturally do not align with some existing approaches and are likely to change following theoretical and methodological development. Nevertheless, we hold that at this stage of the field they are instrumental in evoking a much-needed discussion about the norms of studying unconscious processes and helping researchers make more informed decisions when designing experiments. In the long run, we aim for this paper and future discussions around the outstanding issues to lead to a more convergent corpus of knowledge about the extent-and limits-of unconscious processing.
KW - awareness measures
KW - best practices
KW - perceptual awareness
KW - recommendations
KW - Unconscious processing
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105011762955
U2 - 10.1017/s0140525x25101489
DO - 10.1017/s0140525x25101489
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 40692329
AN - SCOPUS:105011762955
SN - 0140-525X
JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences
JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences
ER -