TY - JOUR
T1 - Structure-function relations of strigolactone analogs
T2 - Activity as plant hormones and plant interactions
AU - Cohen, Maja
AU - Prandi, Cristina
AU - Occhiato, Ernesto G.
AU - Tabasso, Silvia
AU - Wininger, Smadar
AU - Resnick, Nathalie
AU - Steinberger, Yosef
AU - Koltai, Hinanit
AU - Kapulnik, Yoram
PY - 2013/1
Y1 - 2013/1
N2 - Strigolactones (SLs) have several functions as signaling molecules in their interactions with symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and the parasitic weeds Orobanche and Striga. SLs are also a new class of plant hormone regulating plant development. In all three organisms, a specific and sensitive receptor-mediated perception system is suggested. By comparing the activity of synthetic SL analogs on Arabidopsis root-hair elongation, Orobanche aegyptiaca seed germination, and hyphal branching of the AM fungus Glomus intraradices, we found that each of the tested organisms differs in its response to the various examined synthetic SL analogs. Structure–function relations of the SL analogs suggest substitutions on the A-ring as the cause of this variation. Moreover, the description of competitive antagonistic analogs suggests that the A-ring of SL can affect not only affinity to the receptor, but also the molecule’s ability to activate it. The results support the conclusion that Arabidopsis, Orobanche, and AM fungi possess variations in receptor sensitivity to SL analogs, probably due to variation in SL receptors among the different species.
AB - Strigolactones (SLs) have several functions as signaling molecules in their interactions with symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and the parasitic weeds Orobanche and Striga. SLs are also a new class of plant hormone regulating plant development. In all three organisms, a specific and sensitive receptor-mediated perception system is suggested. By comparing the activity of synthetic SL analogs on Arabidopsis root-hair elongation, Orobanche aegyptiaca seed germination, and hyphal branching of the AM fungus Glomus intraradices, we found that each of the tested organisms differs in its response to the various examined synthetic SL analogs. Structure–function relations of the SL analogs suggest substitutions on the A-ring as the cause of this variation. Moreover, the description of competitive antagonistic analogs suggests that the A-ring of SL can affect not only affinity to the receptor, but also the molecule’s ability to activate it. The results support the conclusion that Arabidopsis, Orobanche, and AM fungi possess variations in receptor sensitivity to SL analogs, probably due to variation in SL receptors among the different species.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875715344&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/mp/sss134
DO - 10.1093/mp/sss134
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 23220943
AN - SCOPUS:84875715344
SN - 1674-2052
VL - 6
SP - 141
EP - 152
JO - Molecular Plant
JF - Molecular Plant
IS - 1
ER -