TY - JOUR
T1 - Streamlining justice
T2 - How online courts can resolve the challenges of pro se litigation
AU - Sela, Ayelet
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - The tide of pro se litigation in the American justice system imposes significant constraints on self-represented litigants' (SRLs) access to justice and courts' ability to administer justice. Mitigating the challenges requires a systemic institutional and procedural reform. Advancing this approach, the Article proposes that online courts would alleviate many of the challenges associated with pro se litigation, and puts this proposition to an empirical test. To that end, the Article analyzes the challenges experienced by SRLs and courts and models the procedural and technological properties that would promote SRLs' "day in court" as well as courts' provision of fair and efficient access to justice. Based on the analysis and on a review of successful implementations of judicial online dispute resolution (JODR) systems, the Article proposes a detailed policy design framework for a JODR system for pro se litigation. Finally, the Article reports and discusses the results of an experiment evaluating the effect of the proposed framework on SRLs' procedural justice experiences.
AB - The tide of pro se litigation in the American justice system imposes significant constraints on self-represented litigants' (SRLs) access to justice and courts' ability to administer justice. Mitigating the challenges requires a systemic institutional and procedural reform. Advancing this approach, the Article proposes that online courts would alleviate many of the challenges associated with pro se litigation, and puts this proposition to an empirical test. To that end, the Article analyzes the challenges experienced by SRLs and courts and models the procedural and technological properties that would promote SRLs' "day in court" as well as courts' provision of fair and efficient access to justice. Based on the analysis and on a review of successful implementations of judicial online dispute resolution (JODR) systems, the Article proposes a detailed policy design framework for a JODR system for pro se litigation. Finally, the Article reports and discusses the results of an experiment evaluating the effect of the proposed framework on SRLs' procedural justice experiences.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021182272&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
SN - 1069-0565
VL - 26
SP - 331
EP - 388
JO - Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy
JF - Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy
IS - 2
ER -