Spinoza's Rethinking of Activity: From the Short Treatise to the Ethics

Andrea Sangiacomo, Ohad Nachtomy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper argues that God's immanent causation and Spinoza's account of activity as adequate causation (of finite modes) do not always go together in Spinoza's thought. We show that there is good reason to doubt that this is the case in Spinoza's early Short Treatise on God, Man and His Well-being. In the Short Treatise, Spinoza defends an account of God's immanent causation without fully endorsing the account of activity as adequate causation that he will later introduce in the Ethics (E3def2). We turn to an examination of how God's immanent causation relates to the activity of finite things in the Ethics. We consider two ways to think about the link between God, seen as immanent cause, and the activity of finite things: namely, in terms of entailment and in terms of production. We argue that the productive model is most promising for understanding the way in which the activity of finite things and God's immanent causality are connected in Spinoza's (mature) philosophy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-126
Number of pages26
JournalSouthern Journal of Philosophy
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors. The Southern Journal of Philosophy published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of University of Memphis.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spinoza's Rethinking of Activity: From the Short Treatise to the Ethics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this